PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPI vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPI vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's 2.21% return.


EIPI

1D
1.28%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
14.45%
6M
15.14%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.42%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPI vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
14.45%12.38%13.14%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
2.21%6.65%7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and BALT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024

0.28

The correlation between EIPI and BALT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPI vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPI vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPIBALTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.69

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

5.98

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

22.31

-8.27

EIPI vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPI and BALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and BALT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPIBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-4.89%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-1.15%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

0.00%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-0.34%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.31%

+1.20%

Volatility

EIPI vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.29%. This indicates that EIPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPIBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

0.29%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

1.45%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

2.16%

+7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

3.30%

+9.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.03%

3.30%

+9.73%

EIPI vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPI vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.79%9.71%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIPI and BALT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPI has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to BALT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPI dropped -12.33% vs BALT's -4.89%.

On 1-year performance, EIPI leads with 21.10% vs 6.86% for BALT. On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EIPI has performed better with a 21.10% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 0.00% for BALT.

EIPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BALT is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for EIPI and 0.69% for BALT.

BALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPI and BALT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer