EINC vs. UMI
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI).
EINC and UMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EINC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Mar 13, 2012. UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021.
Performance
EINC vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EINC vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 20.92% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 38.05% | -19.89% | 16.98% | -19.85% | 2.41% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 18.78% | 5.11% | 42.97% | 14.60% | 20.78% | 20.97% | -8.25% | 21.06% | -10.64% | 2.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 18.78% return.
EINC
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 20.92%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 20.49%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
UMI
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 26.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.65%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EINC vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
UMI
EINC vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EINC | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.25 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 4.13 | +0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EINC | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.62 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and UMI is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EINC vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than UMI's 6.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.81% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 6.07% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and UMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -48.08% | -39.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -14.76% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -20.05% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.88% | -3.39% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.78% | -6.67% | -38.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 4.47% | -0.25% |
Volatility
EINC vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is 3.66%, while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that EINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | UMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 4.10% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 9.89% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 17.84% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 20.47% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 23.29% | +2.19% |