EINC vs. TSCM
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while TSCM is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by TimesSquare. EINC is passively managed, while TSCM is actively managed. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EINC charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.
Performance
EINC vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly higher than TSCM's 4.10% return.
EINC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- YTD
- 27.20%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 22.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.99%
TSCM
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $731.46K | $2.80M | $2.24M | |
| $29.97K | $30.73K | $32.55K |
EINC vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 27.20% | 0.04% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.10% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and TSCM is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. TSCM — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
TSCM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EINC | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EINC vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than TSCM's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and TSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -14.87% | -72.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -4.68% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -5.45% | -38.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility
EINC vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 21.15% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 21.15% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 21.15% | +4.18% |
EINC vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, while TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 4.23% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and TSCM have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while TSCM is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TimesSquare. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for EINC and 0.55% for TSCM.
Find the right allocation for EINC and TSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer