EINC vs. TPZ
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. EINC is passively managed, while TPZ is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EINC returned 11.78%/yr vs 8.62%/yr for TPZ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TPZ.
Performance
EINC vs. TPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 29.71% return, which is significantly higher than TPZ's 10.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EINC has outperformed TPZ with an annualized return of 11.78%, while TPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.
EINC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 28.55%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 33.52%
- 3Y*
- 29.16%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
TPZ
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 13.35%
- 3Y*
- 25.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
EINC vs. TPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 29.71% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 38.05% | -19.89% | 16.98% | -19.85% | -3.45% |
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 10.28% | 5.67% | 53.88% | 20.72% | 2.44% | 29.31% | -27.84% | 15.61% | -16.12% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and TPZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2012 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EINC and TPZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. TPZ — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
TPZ
EINC vs. TPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EINC | TPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 2.13 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 4.70 | +5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EINC vs. TPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than TPZ's maximum drawdown of -78.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and TPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | TPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -78.17% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -6.29% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -17.78% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -17.78% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | -77.04% | +8.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -2.59% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -11.88% | -32.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.84% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EINC vs. TPZ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) at 3.91%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | TPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 3.91% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 10.78% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 13.76% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 17.69% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 27.70% | -2.37% |
EINC vs. TPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TPZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. TPZ - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than TPZ's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.41% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 3.69% | 3.99% | 5.88% | 8.99% | 9.52% | 4.77% | 8.80% | 8.84% | 9.41% | 7.28% | 6.88% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and TPZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EINC has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to TPZ (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs TPZ's -78.17%.
On 10-year performance, EINC leads with 11.78% vs 8.62% for TPZ. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EINC has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.
TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 3.41% for EINC.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.85% for TPZ.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EINC and TPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer