EINC vs. TPYP
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both Energy Equities funds - EINC tracks the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index while TPYP tracks the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EINC returned 11.62%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for TPYP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
EINC vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than TPYP's 20.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EINC having a 11.62% annualized return and TPYP not far ahead at 11.93%.
EINC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
EINC vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.74% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 38.05% | -19.89% | 16.98% | -19.85% | -3.45% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.07% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and TPYP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EINC and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EINC vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EINC
TPYP
Energy
Industrials
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
EINC
TPYP
Industrials
EINC
TPYP
-
Utilities
EINC
TPYP
Basic Materials
EINC
-
TPYP
Communication Services
EINC
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
EINC
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
EINC
-
TPYP
-
Financial Services
EINC
-
TPYP
Healthcare
EINC
-
TPYP
-
Real Estate
EINC
-
TPYP
-
Technology
EINC
-
TPYP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
TPYP
EINC vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EINC | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.09 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 8.34 | +0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EINC | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.61 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.43 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -51.91% | -35.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -6.84% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -13.17% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -17.96% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | -51.91% | -16.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -5.27% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -7.89% | -36.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.56% | +0.29% |
Volatility
EINC vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 5.67%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 5.67% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 10.29% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 13.16% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 17.45% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 21.94% | +3.49% |
EINC vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than TPYP's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EINC and TPYP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EINC has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to TPYP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.93% vs 11.62% for EINC. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.
EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.40% for TPYP.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EINC and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer