PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EINC vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EINC vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than TPYP's 20.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EINC having a 11.62% annualized return and TPYP not far ahead at 11.93%.


EINC

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
24.74%
6M
24.40%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
29.18%
5Y*
20.73%
10Y*
11.62%

TPYP

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
20.07%
6M
19.62%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
24.74%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.07%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and TPYP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.82

The correlation between EINC and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EINC vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EINC
TPYP

Energy

99.5%
68.8%

Industrials

2.5%

-

Utilities

0.6%
22.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

EINC
99.5%
TPYP
68.8%

Industrials

EINC
2.5%
TPYP

-

Utilities

EINC
0.6%
TPYP
22.0%

Basic Materials

EINC

-

TPYP
0.1%

Communication Services

EINC

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

EINC

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Defensive

EINC

-

TPYP

-

Financial Services

EINC

-

TPYP
2.4%

Healthcare

EINC

-

TPYP

-

Real Estate

EINC

-

TPYP

-

Technology

EINC

-

TPYP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EINC vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EINCTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.09

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

8.34

+0.83

EINC vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EINCTPYPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.61

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.02

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.55

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.43

-0.39

Drawdowns

EINC vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EINCTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-51.91%

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-6.84%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-13.17%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-17.96%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

-51.91%

-16.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-5.27%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-7.89%

-36.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.56%

+0.29%

Volatility

EINC vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 5.67%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EINCTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

5.67%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

10.29%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

13.16%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

17.45%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

21.94%

+3.49%

EINC vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EINC vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than TPYP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.55%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.25%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EINC and TPYP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EINC has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to TPYP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.93% vs 11.62% for EINC. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.

EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.40% for TPYP.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EINC and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer