PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EINC vs. MTRX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EINC is traded in USD, while MTRX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MTRX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than MTRX.TO's 37.43% return.


EINC

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
24.74%
6M
24.40%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
29.18%
5Y*
20.73%
10Y*
11.62%

MTRX.TO

1D
-1.00%
1M
5.78%
YTD
37.43%
6M
41.40%
1Y
83.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EINC and MTRX.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EINC vs. MTRX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MTRX.TO
MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EINCMTRX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

5.36

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

18.69

-9.52

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and MTRX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EINCMTRX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.78

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

2.10

-2.06

Drawdowns

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than MTRX.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and MTRX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EINCMTRX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-18.08%

-69.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-15.68%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-1.00%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-4.13%

-40.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

4.49%

-1.64%

Volatility

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is 6.39%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that EINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTRX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EINCMTRX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

9.75%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

24.53%

-12.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

30.24%

-15.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

32.78%

-13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

32.78%

-7.35%

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MTRX.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EINC vs. MTRX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than MTRX.TO's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.55%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
MTRX.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EINC and MTRX.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MTRX.TO.

EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while MTRX.TO is Technology Equities. EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while MTRX.TO tracks Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.49% for MTRX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EINC and MTRX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer