EINC vs. BILD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. EINC is passively managed, while BILD is actively managed. Over the past year, EINC returned 26.00% vs 14.53% for BILD. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BILD.

Performance

EINC vs. BILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 7.24% return.

EINC

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 24.40%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 29.18%
• 5Y*: 20.73%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

BILD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 14.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.74%	7.11%	42.79%	0.91%
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	7.24%	21.08%	-2.68%	3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and BILD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.38

EINC vs. BILD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EINC	BILD
Energy	99.5%	18.4%
Industrials	2.5%	20.4%
Utilities	0.6%	54.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.5%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

EINC vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 53
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BILD

BILD Risk / Return Rank: 40
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EINC	BILD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.35	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.86	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.24	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	2.41	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	6.80	+2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EINC vs. BILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the BILD Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and BILD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EINC	BILD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.35	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.88	-0.84

Drawdowns

EINC vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and BILD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EINC	BILD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.55%	-14.78%	-72.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-6.05%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.44%	-5.05%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.29%	-3.70%	-40.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	2.14%	+0.71%

Volatility

EINC vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 4.05%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EINC	BILD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	4.05%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	8.88%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	10.78%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.58%	13.23%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	13.23%	+12.20%

EINC vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EINC vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than BILD's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF	2.86%	3.05%	5.53%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.55%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EINC and BILD in my portfolio?

EINC and BILD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EINC or BILD?

EINC has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to BILD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs BILD's -14.78%.

Which ETF is better, EINC or BILD?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 26.00% vs 14.53% for BILD. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EINC or BILD?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 26.00% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EINC or BILD?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EINC or BILD?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.86% for BILD.

What is the main difference between EINC and BILD?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.49% for BILD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.