EINC vs. BBHM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while BBHM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.

Performance

EINC vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than BBHM's 1.78% return.

EINC

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 24.40%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 29.18%
• 5Y*: 20.73%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

BBHM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -0.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.74%	1.76%
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	1.78%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and BBHM is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

EINC vs. BBHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 53
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EINC	BBHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EINC	BBHM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.50	-0.47

Drawdowns

EINC vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and BBHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EINC	BBHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.55%	-9.78%	-77.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.44%	-5.28%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.29%	-2.71%	-41.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EINC	BBHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	17.46%	-2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.58%	17.46%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	17.46%	+7.97%

EINC vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

EINC vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.55%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EINC and BBHM in my portfolio?

EINC and BBHM have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EINC or BBHM?

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EINC or BBHM?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EINC or BBHM?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between EINC and BBHM?

EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while BBHM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while BBHM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.81% for BBHM.