PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EIMI.L is traded in USD, while VEUR.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VEUR.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 26.55% return, which is significantly higher than VEUR.MI's 6.88% return.


EIMI.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
7.29%
YTD
26.55%
6M
29.01%
1Y
50.82%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
10.53%

VEUR.MI

1D
0.00%
1M
1.68%
YTD
6.88%
6M
8.21%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
26.55%32.16%7.36%11.03%-19.67%-0.65%18.80%11.11%
VEUR.MI
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF
6.88%36.34%2.84%19.97%-15.17%15.29%7.05%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EIMI.L and VEUR.MI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.66

The correlation between EIMI.L and VEUR.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VEUR.MI
VEUR.MI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VEUR.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIMI.LVEUR.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

1.93

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

6.80

+7.46

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the VEUR.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIMI.L and VEUR.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, which is greater than VEUR.MI's maximum drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and VEUR.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIMI.LVEUR.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.73%

-35.87%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-11.46%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-14.99%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

-31.49%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-1.10%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-5.95%

-8.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.23%

+0.43%

Volatility

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.MI) at 4.06%. This indicates that EIMI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEUR.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIMI.LVEUR.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

4.06%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

12.44%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

14.87%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

17.64%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

18.71%

+0.49%

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VEUR.MI's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EIMI.L vs. VEUR.MI - Dividend Comparison

EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEUR.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEUR.MI
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF
2.62%2.79%3.07%3.00%3.32%2.66%2.23%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIMI.L and VEUR.MI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEUR.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEUR.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.

EIMI.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VEUR.MI is Europe Equities. EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while VEUR.MI tracks FTSE Developed Europe Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMI.L and 0.10% for VEUR.MI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIMI.L and VEUR.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer