EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) and IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L returned 10.60%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for IUHC.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIMI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUHC.L.

Performance

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than IUHC.L's -0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L has outperformed IUHC.L with an annualized return of 10.60%, while IUHC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.60% annualized return.

EIMI.L

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 22.83%
• 6M: 26.10%
• 1Y: 43.20%
• 3Y*: 21.64%
• 5Y*: 7.50%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

IUHC.L

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 5.46%
• YTD: -0.88%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 14.44%
• 3Y*: 6.86%
• 5Y*: 5.75%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF	22.83%	32.16%	7.36%	11.03%	-19.67%	-0.65%	18.80%	16.37%	-14.18%	36.94%
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-0.88%	14.72%	2.16%	1.72%	-2.63%	27.58%	11.93%	20.55%	4.52%	22.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EIMI.L and IUHC.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between EIMI.L and IUHC.L has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIMI.L	IUHC.L
Technology	35.0%	-
Financial Services	18.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Basic Materials	6.9%	-
Communication Services	6.4%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIMI.L

EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

IUHC.L

IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIMI.L	IUHC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	0.96	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.54	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.17	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	1.38	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	3.41	+8.35

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIMI.L and IUHC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and IUHC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIMI.L	IUHC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.73%	-27.44%	-11.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.66%	-10.40%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	-17.62%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.45%	-17.62%	-17.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.73%	-27.44%	-11.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.75%	-3.36%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.99%	-4.90%	-9.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	4.20%	-0.54%

Volatility

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) at 4.95%. This indicates that EIMI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIMI.L	IUHC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.37%	4.95%	+3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.62%	10.82%	+6.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	15.05%	+4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.46%	14.80%	+3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	15.74%	+3.46%

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IUHC.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EIMI.L vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EIMI.L nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIMI.L and IUHC.L in my portfolio?

EIMI.L and IUHC.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EIMI.L or IUHC.L?

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIMI.L or IUHC.L?

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.

What is the main difference between EIMI.L and IUHC.L?

EIMI.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IUHC.L is Health & Biotech Equities. EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMI.L and 0.15% for IUHC.L.