EIMI.L vs. IESU.L
EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IESU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for IESU.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIMI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EIMI.L is traded in USD, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 28.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIMI.L having a 8.91% annualized return and IESU.L not far behind at 8.78%.
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 28.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
IESU.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 14.85% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.18% | 36.94% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.54% | 9.98% | 3.69% | -1.00% | 63.91% | 52.43% | -33.64% | 9.60% | -18.29% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and IESU.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.34 |
The correlation between EIMI.L and IESU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
EIMI.L
IESU.L
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIMI.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.21 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 5.65 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIMI.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -72.57% | +33.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -16.37% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -22.55% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.67% | -27.74% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | -66.85% | +28.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.66% | -8.87% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -24.88% | +10.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 6.42% | -2.35% |
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) at 6.97%. This indicates that EIMI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIMI.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 6.97% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 21.03% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 23.89% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 29.47% | -10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 29.81% | -10.58% |
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EIMI.L nor IESU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EIMI.L and IESU.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
EIMI.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IESU.L is Energy Equities. EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMI.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for EIMI.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer