EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L
EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) and HTWD.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EIMI.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index while HTWD.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 20.23%/yr for HTWD.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EIMI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWD.L.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 51.61% return. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L has underperformed HTWD.L with an annualized return of 8.91%, while HTWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.23% annualized return.
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 28.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
HTWD.L
- 1D
- -4.13%
- 1M
- -10.54%
- 6M
- 42.37%
- YTD
- 51.61%
- 1Y
- 73.67%
- 3Y*
- 38.33%
- 5Y*
- 19.33%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 14.85% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.18% | 36.94% |
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 51.61% | 32.26% | 25.40% | 28.98% | -29.41% | 27.78% | 36.62% | 33.56% | -8.71% | 27.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and HTWD.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EIMI.L and HTWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
EIMI.L
HTWD.L
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIMI.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 5.31 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 17.31 | -10.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, smaller than the maximum HTWD.L drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and HTWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIMI.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -41.06% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -13.80% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -28.22% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.67% | -41.06% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | -41.06% | +2.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.66% | -13.80% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -9.66% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 4.24% | -0.17% |
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) is 8.54%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L) has a volatility of 11.37%. This indicates that EIMI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIMI.L | HTWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 11.37% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 24.13% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 27.64% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 23.64% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.67% | -2.44% |
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison
EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.08% | 1.53% | 1.18% | 2.73% | 3.31% | 1.13% | 1.69% | 2.08% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 2.64% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIMI.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWD.L.
EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while HTWD.L tracks MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMI.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.
Find the right allocation for EIMI.L and HTWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer