EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L
EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) and DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EIMI.L returned 7.50%/yr vs -6.37%/yr for DTLA.L. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. EIMI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for DTLA.L.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than DTLA.L's -0.86% return.
EIMI.L
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 26.10%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 22.83% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -12.71% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.86% | 4.49% | -6.90% | 1.69% | -30.29% | -4.46% | 17.00% | 15.69% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and DTLA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018 | -0.07 |
The correlation between EIMI.L and DTLA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EIMI.L
DTLA.L
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIMI.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.06 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 0.45 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 1.12 | +10.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, smaller than the maximum DTLA.L drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and DTLA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIMI.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -48.41% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -7.50% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -18.57% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.41% | -42.80% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -40.40% | +36.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -24.06% | +10.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.00% | +0.66% |
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that EIMI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIMI.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 3.33% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.62% | 6.74% | +10.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 10.03% | +9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 14.95% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 14.79% | +4.41% |
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EIMI.L nor DTLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EIMI.L and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
EIMI.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMI.L and 0.07% for DTLA.L.
Find the right allocation for EIMI.L and DTLA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer