EILGX vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
EILGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | -10.39% | 10.85% | 10.63% | 25.66% | -20.27% | 30.41% | 27.18% | 38.37% | 8.31% | 27.41% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -8.68% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EILGX achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly lower than BLUEX's -8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EILGX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 13.59%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
EILGX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -9.24%
- 1Y
- -0.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EILGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EILGX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
EILGX
BLUEX
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EILGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | -0.66 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | -0.89 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | -0.69 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | -2.40 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EILGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | -0.66 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.05 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.57 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EILGX and BLUEX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
EILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.17%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | 17.17% | 15.39% | 4.34% | 0.57% | 0.32% | 2.18% | 0.62% | 0.17% | 19.72% | 54.05% | 17.75% | 23.15% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EILGX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EILGX and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EILGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -54.27% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -12.19% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -21.87% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.85% | -29.06% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -10.58% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -13.39% | +6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 3.51% | +0.86% |
Volatility
EILGX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.64%. This indicates that EILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EILGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 3.64% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 7.31% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 11.01% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 10.50% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 16.57% | +1.30% |