EIGMX vs. EIAMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) and Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX).
EIGMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 26, 2007. EIAMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 31, 2011.
Performance
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 2.31% | 11.37% | 8.69% | 6.99% | -0.47% | 2.19% | 3.59% | 9.76% | -3.29% | 4.29% |
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | -0.88% | 6.31% | 8.22% | 9.93% | -6.18% | 4.57% | 1.89% | 11.67% | -2.45% | 11.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIGMX achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than EIAMX's -0.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIGMX having a 4.83% annualized return and EIAMX not far behind at 4.80%.
EIGMX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
EIAMX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIGMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than EIAMX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIGMX vs. EIAMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIGMX
EIAMX
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) and Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIGMX | EIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.02 | 1.80 | +4.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.81 | 2.96 | +5.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.97 | 1.55 | +1.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.10 | 2.50 | +5.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.24 | 11.20 | +22.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIGMX | EIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.02 | 1.80 | +4.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.37 | 1.25 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.94 | 0.21 | +1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.22 | +1.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIGMX and EIAMX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Dividend Comparison
EIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than EIAMX's 6.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 6.74% | 5.72% | 6.16% | 5.79% | 4.78% | 4.18% | 4.37% | 5.44% | 3.72% | 3.42% | 4.02% | 5.54% |
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | 6.51% | 7.04% | 7.35% | 5.52% | 5.46% | 4.10% | 4.46% | 4.94% | 2.41% | 2.88% | 3.15% | 3.77% |
Drawdowns
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIGMX drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, smaller than the maximum EIAMX drawdown of -43.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIGMX and EIAMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIGMX | EIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -43.35% | +33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -2.14% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.39% | -10.02% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.42% | -43.35% | +33.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -10.97% | +9.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -16.21% | +15.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.48% | -0.13% |
Volatility
EIGMX vs. EIAMX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) at 0.73%. This indicates that EIGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIGMX | EIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.73% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.57% | 1.72% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98% | 2.74% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 3.17% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.50% | 22.48% | -19.98% |