EIAMX vs. E
EIAMX (Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while E (Eni S.p.A.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EIAMX returned 4.56%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for E. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EIAMX vs. E - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIAMX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than E's 49.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EIAMX has underperformed E with an annualized return of 4.56%, while E has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.
EIAMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.30%
E
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 38.91%
- YTD
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 72.88%
- 3Y*
- 30.16%
- 5Y*
- 26.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.39M | $21.06M | $21.85M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EIAMX vs. E - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | 1.59% | 6.31% | 8.22% | 9.93% | -6.18% | 4.57% | 1.89% | 11.67% | -2.45% | 11.61% |
E Eni S.p.A. | 49.82% | 48.40% | -13.95% | 26.73% | 10.92% | 43.12% | -28.73% | 4.29% | -0.98% | 7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIAMX and E is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011 | 0.34 |
The correlation between EIAMX and E shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIAMX vs. E — Risk / Return Rank
EIAMX
E
EIAMX vs. E - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIAMX | E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.46 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.64 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.40 | 12.58 | +0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIAMX vs. E - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIAMX drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, smaller than the maximum E drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIAMX and E.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIAMX | E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.35% | -70.53% | +27.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.52% | -20.00% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.95% | -20.13% | +17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -33.71% | +23.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -61.59% | +18.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | -2.47% | -6.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -23.02% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 5.79% | -5.45% |
Volatility
EIAMX vs. E - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) is 0.34%, while Eni S.p.A. (E) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that EIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIAMX | E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 10.66% | -10.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.78% | 21.89% | -20.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40% | 25.66% | -23.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.20% | 25.37% | -22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 28.17% | -5.71% |
Dividends
EIAMX vs. E - Dividend Comparison
EIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than E's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Eni S.p.A. | 4.34% | 5.88% | 7.69% | 5.74% | 6.38% | 5.79% | 5.91% | 6.11% | 5.15% | 3.96% | 3.98% | 5.14% |
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | 6.27% | 7.04% | 7.35% | 5.52% | 5.46% | 4.10% | 4.46% | 4.94% | 2.41% | 2.88% | 3.15% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIAMX and E have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
E has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to EIAMX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIAMX dropped -43.35% vs E's -70.53%.
E currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIAMX and E
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer