EIG vs. AMN
EIG (Employers Holdings, Inc.) and AMN (AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.) are both stocks. EIG operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services), while AMN operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, EIG returned 9.26%/yr vs -2.34%/yr for AMN. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EIG vs. AMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIG achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly lower than AMN's 113.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EIG has outperformed AMN with an annualized return of 9.26%, while AMN has yielded a comparatively lower -2.34% annualized return.
EIG
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.13%
AMN
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 57.89%
- YTD
- 113.39%
- 1Y
- 88.40%
- 3Y*
- -31.84%
- 5Y*
- -19.67%
- 10Y*
- -2.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.20M | $25.99M | $32.30M | |
| $10.46M | $10.21M | $11.54M |
EIG vs. AMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIG Employers Holdings, Inc. | 18.98% | -13.32% | 33.36% | -6.10% | 12.57% | 31.88% | -20.54% | 1.59% | -3.67% | 13.72% |
AMN AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 113.39% | -34.11% | -68.06% | -27.17% | -15.95% | 79.24% | 9.53% | 9.97% | 15.05% | 28.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIG and AMN is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EIG and AMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (5 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EIG:
$1.12B
AMN:
$1.30B
EIG:
$0.42
AMN:
-$0.84
EIG:
1.09
AMN:
0.38
EIG:
$837.30M
AMN:
$3.42B
EIG:
$215.90M
AMN:
$872.54M
EIG:
-$14.10M
AMN:
$165.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIG vs. AMN — Risk / Return Rank
EIG
AMN
EIG vs. AMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIG | AMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.92 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 6.37 | -2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIG vs. AMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIG drawdown since its inception was -63.87%, smaller than the maximum AMN drawdown of -89.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIG and AMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIG | AMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.87% | -89.99% | +26.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.40% | -28.67% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.29% | -83.57% | +52.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -88.11% | +56.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -88.11% | +44.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -73.53% | +70.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -45.88% | +28.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 13.17% | -6.72% |
Volatility
EIG vs. AMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) is 7.54%, while AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that EIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIG | AMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 15.75% | -8.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.43% | 47.93% | -29.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.63% | 65.72% | -39.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 52.43% | -28.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 46.84% | -20.21% |
Dividends
EIG vs. AMN - Dividend Comparison
EIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while AMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMN AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIG Employers Holdings, Inc. | 2.57% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.79% | 7.60% | 2.42% | 3.11% | 2.11% | 1.91% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.88% |
Financials
EIG vs. AMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Employers Holdings, Inc. and AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EIG vs. AMN - Profitability Comparison
EIG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Employers Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 220.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 368.84M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
EIG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Employers Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 220.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 117.17M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
EIG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Employers Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 29.10M and revenue of 220.20M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
AMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported a net income of 62.17M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EIG and AMN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMN has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to EIG (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIG dropped -63.87% vs AMN's -89.99%.
AMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIG and AMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer