PortfoliosLab logo
AMN vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMN and VGT is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AMN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

AMN:

68.30%

VGT:

14.95%

Max Drawdown

AMN:

-1.51%

VGT:

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

AMN:

0.00%

VGT:

0.00%

Returns By Period


AMN

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMN vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMN is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMN is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMN is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMN is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMN is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMN is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

AMN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

AMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMN
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMN drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMN and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AMN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...