PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMN vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMN and VGT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

AMN vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-56.68%
18.68%
AMN
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMN:

-1.09

VGT:

1.07

Sortino Ratio

AMN:

-1.71

VGT:

1.49

Omega Ratio

AMN:

0.75

VGT:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

AMN:

-0.79

VGT:

1.57

Martin Ratio

AMN:

-1.49

VGT:

5.46

Ulcer Index

AMN:

43.57%

VGT:

4.38%

Daily Std Dev

AMN:

59.66%

VGT:

22.43%

Max Drawdown

AMN:

-89.99%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

AMN:

-78.98%

VGT:

-4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMN achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, AMN has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 2.93%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return.


AMN

YTD

11.62%

1M

4.87%

6M

-56.68%

1Y

-63.79%

5Y*

-17.68%

10Y*

2.93%

VGT

YTD

-0.93%

1M

-2.67%

6M

18.68%

1Y

22.67%

5Y*

19.20%

10Y*

20.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMN vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMN is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMN is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMN is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMN is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMN is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMN vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMN, currently valued at -1.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-1.091.07
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMN, currently valued at -1.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.711.49
The chart of Omega ratio for AMN, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.751.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMN, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.791.57
The chart of Martin ratio for AMN, currently valued at -1.49, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-1.495.46
AMN
VGT

The current AMN Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMN and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.09
1.07
AMN
VGT

Dividends

AMN vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

AMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMN
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.60%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

AMN vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMN drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMN and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-78.98%
-4.82%
AMN
VGT

Volatility

AMN vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.69%. This indicates that AMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.73%
8.69%
AMN
VGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab