AMN vs. MEDP

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP).

Performance

AMN vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMN vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMN AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.	15.48%	-34.11%	-68.06%	-27.17%	-15.95%	79.24%	9.53%	9.97%	15.05%	28.09%
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	-11.27%	69.05%	8.38%	44.31%	-2.40%	56.35%	65.60%	58.81%	45.97%	0.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMN : $704.94M MEDP : $14.43B
EPS AMN : -$2.48 MEDP : $15.23
PS Ratio AMN : 0.26 MEDP : 5.83
PB Ratio AMN : 1.10 MEDP : 31.44
Total Revenue (TTM) AMN : $2.73B MEDP : $2.53B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMN : $774.06M MEDP : $760.62M
EBITDA (TTM) AMN : $63.90M MEDP : $541.22M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMN achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly higher than MEDP's -11.27% return.

AMN

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: -13.29%
• YTD: 15.48%
• 6M: -6.91%
• 1Y: -22.06%
• 3Y*: -39.71%
• 5Y*: -24.42%
• 10Y*: -6.20%

MEDP

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: -11.27%
• 6M: -7.06%
• 1Y: 60.12%
• 3Y*: 37.87%
• 5Y*: 24.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMN vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMN

AMN Risk / Return Rank: 21
AMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
AMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AMN Omega Ratio Rank: 25
AMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
AMN Martin Ratio Rank: 16

MEDP

MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 77
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMN vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMN	MEDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	0.89	-1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	2.24	-2.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.31	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	2.04	-2.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	5.97	-7.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMN vs. MEDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the MEDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMN and MEDP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMN	MEDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37	0.89	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.49	0.47	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.71	-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between AMN and MEDP is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMN vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMN nor MEDP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMN vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMN drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMN and MEDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMN	MEDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.99%	-42.87%	-47.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.18%	-32.96%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.11%	-42.87%	-45.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.67%	-19.70%	-65.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.46%	-12.64%	-32.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.36%	11.28%	+8.08%

Volatility

AMN vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) at 11.14%. This indicates that AMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMN	MEDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.92%	11.14%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.73%	29.12%	+17.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.93%	67.73%	-7.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.63%	50.89%	-1.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.43%	49.57%	-4.14%

Financials

AMN vs. MEDP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.51M and revenue of 748.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

MEDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 205.32M and revenue of 708.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.

AMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 47.30M and revenue of 748.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MEDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 153.27M and revenue of 708.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

AMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported a net income of -7.70M and revenue of 748.23M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.

MEDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 135.13M and revenue of 708.45M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.