AMN vs. MEDP
AMN (AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.) and MEDP (Medpace Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — AMN in Medical Care Facilities, MEDP in Diagnostics & Research. Over the past 5 years, AMN returned -20.12%/yr vs 21.65%/yr for MEDP. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMN vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMN achieves a 92.32% return, which is significantly higher than MEDP's -19.73% return.
AMN
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 46.28%
- YTD
- 92.32%
- 6M
- 81.61%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- -32.73%
- 5Y*
- -20.12%
- 10Y*
- -2.37%
MEDP
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- -19.73%
- 6M
- -21.80%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.58%
- 5Y*
- 21.65%
- 10Y*
- —
AMN vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMN AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 92.32% | -34.11% | -68.06% | -27.17% | -15.95% | 79.24% | 9.53% | 9.97% | 15.05% | 28.09% |
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | -19.73% | 69.05% | 8.38% | 44.31% | -2.40% | 56.35% | 65.60% | 58.81% | 45.97% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMN and MEDP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2016 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
AMN:
$1.19B
MEDP:
$13.06B
AMN:
-$0.84
MEDP:
$15.63
AMN:
0.34
MEDP:
4.96
AMN:
1.66
MEDP:
21.82
AMN:
$3.42B
MEDP:
$2.68B
AMN:
$872.54M
MEDP:
$778.59M
AMN:
$165.94M
MEDP:
$572.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMN vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank
AMN
MEDP
AMN vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMN | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.30 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 2.98 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMN | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.69 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.42 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.66 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
AMN vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMN drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMN and MEDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMN | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.99% | -42.87% | -47.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.44% | -36.61% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.48% | -39.38% | -47.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.11% | -42.87% | -45.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.14% | -27.36% | -48.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.71% | -12.89% | -32.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.29% | 15.92% | +0.37% |
Volatility
AMN vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) has a higher volatility of 30.44% compared to Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) at 7.02%. This indicates that AMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMN | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.44% | 7.02% | +23.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.95% | 38.13% | +13.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.79% | 69.32% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.90% | 51.61% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.59% | 49.82% | -3.23% |
Dividends
AMN vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMN nor MEDP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMN vs. MEDP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMN vs. MEDP - Profitability Comparison
AMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 368.84M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
MEDP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.33M and revenue of 706.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.
AMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 117.17M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
MEDP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.50M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
AMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. reported a net income of 62.17M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
MEDP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 123.87M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMN and MEDP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMN has higher volatility (30.44%) compared to MEDP (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMN dropped -89.99% vs MEDP's -42.87%.
AMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMN and MEDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer