AMN vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMN or COST.
Key characteristics
| AMN | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -24.88% | 9.70% |
| 1Y Return | -34.62% | 50.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.12% | 27.07% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.82% | 26.52% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.15% | 22.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.82 | 2.64 |
| Daily Std Dev | 42.95% | 18.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.99% | -87.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -55.72% | -7.96% |
Fundamentals
| AMN | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.16B | $314.67B |
| EPS | $5.36 | $15.25 |
| PE Ratio | 10.63 | 46.53 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.31 | 5.15 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.79B | $248.83B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.72B | $30.10B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $501.79M | $11.07B |
Correlation
The correlation between AMN and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AMN vs. COST - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMN achieves a -24.88% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AMN has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 16.15%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMN vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMN vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
AMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMN AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.80% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
AMN vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMN drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -87.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMN and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMN vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 3.98%. This indicates that AMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AMN vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities