EIFGX vs. EISMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX).
EIFGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 7, 2011. EISMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund | -8.66% | 14.48% | 42.07% | 42.23% | -32.01% | 16.33% | 44.64% | 35.77% | 0.68% | 25.44% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | -4.80% | -5.66% | 17.64% | 14.01% | -8.77% | 22.02% | 11.31% | 34.37% | -5.55% | 24.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a -8.66% return, which is significantly lower than EISMX's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX has outperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 16.00%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.
EIFGX
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -8.66%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- 13.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 16.00%
EISMX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- 1Y
- -6.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIFGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIFGX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIFGX
EISMX
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIFGX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | -0.31 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | -0.33 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.96 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | -0.36 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | -0.82 | +4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIFGX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | -0.31 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.24 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.52 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.53 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIFGX and EISMX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison
EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.73%, more than EISMX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund | 27.73% | 25.32% | 10.78% | 2.74% | 32.69% | 16.44% | 8.74% | 9.36% | 10.11% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 1.25% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | 6.75% | 6.43% | 7.26% | 2.78% | 10.37% | 10.49% | 9.80% | 6.52% | 7.20% | 3.30% | 3.58% | 6.70% |
Drawdowns
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and EISMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIFGX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -45.32% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.60% | -14.66% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -19.81% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.93% | -39.95% | +3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.42% | -15.38% | +3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -5.77% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 6.43% | -2.34% |
Volatility
EIFGX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) at 4.80%. This indicates that EIFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIFGX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 4.80% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 11.30% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 18.96% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 17.09% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 18.83% | +2.88% |