EIDO vs. TLT
EIDO (iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIDO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIDO returned -3.60%/yr vs -1.74%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. EIDO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
EIDO vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -33.53% return, which is significantly lower than TLT's 0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed TLT with an annualized return of -3.60%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively higher -1.74% annualized return.
EIDO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -33.53%
- 6M
- -32.96%
- 1Y
- -25.70%
- 3Y*
- -15.88%
- 5Y*
- -7.01%
- 10Y*
- -3.60%
TLT
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.89%
- 5Y*
- -6.59%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
EIDO vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | -33.53% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 2.56% | -0.16% | -0.60% | -7.13% | 5.30% | -10.88% | 19.40% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.77% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIDO and TLT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010 | -0.13 |
The correlation between EIDO and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIDO vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
EIDO
TLT
EIDO vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIDO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.07 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.51 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 1.22 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIDO vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIDO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -48.35% | -14.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.81% | -7.58% | -36.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.77% | -19.18% | -32.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.77% | -43.70% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.41% | -48.35% | -11.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.63% | -39.82% | -14.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -13.87% | -10.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 3.18% | +11.33% |
Volatility
EIDO vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.20%. This indicates that EIDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIDO | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | 2.20% | +12.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.25% | 6.62% | +15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.45% | 9.48% | +15.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 15.82% | +4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 14.88% | +10.10% |
EIDO vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIDO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIDO vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than TLT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | 3.35% | 3.56% | 5.20% | 2.94% | 2.53% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.78% | 1.99% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.67% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIDO and TLT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIDO has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to TLT (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, TLT leads with -1.74% vs -3.60% for EIDO. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TLT has performed better with a -1.74% return vs -3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIDO.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.35% for EIDO.
EIDO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIDO and 0.15% for TLT.
TLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIDO and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer