PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EICOX vs. INSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EICOX vs. INSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Insmed Incorporated (INSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICOX achieves a 27.67% return, which is significantly higher than INSM's -40.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EICOX has underperformed INSM with an annualized return of 13.62%, while INSM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.16% annualized return.


EICOX

1D
0.34%
1M
10.85%
YTD
27.67%
6M
31.74%
1Y
52.16%
3Y*
28.97%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
13.62%

INSM

1D
0.13%
1M
-25.82%
YTD
-40.32%
6M
-49.77%
1Y
42.12%
3Y*
74.52%
5Y*
32.61%
10Y*
24.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EICOX vs. INSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EICOX
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund
27.67%33.22%11.99%25.78%-14.59%13.43%13.46%12.59%-14.57%31.41%
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
-40.32%152.09%122.78%55.11%-26.65%-18.17%39.41%82.01%-57.92%135.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EICOX and INSM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.28

The correlation between EICOX and INSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EICOX vs. INSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EICOX
EICOX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EICOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EICOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EICOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EICOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EICOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

INSM
INSM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
INSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
INSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EICOX vs. INSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Insmed Incorporated (INSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EICOXINSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

0.73

+2.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.16

1.40

+2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.22

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

0.81

+3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.07

1.93

+13.14

EICOX vs. INSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the INSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICOX and INSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EICOXINSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

0.73

+2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.45

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.31

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-0.02

+0.80

Drawdowns

EICOX vs. INSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICOX drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, smaller than the maximum INSM drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICOX and INSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EICOXINSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.75%

-98.65%

+59.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-52.06%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-52.06%

+37.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-52.06%

+29.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

-64.84%

+26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-50.87%

+50.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.69%

-86.12%

+77.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

21.89%

-18.41%

Volatility

EICOX vs. INSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) is 7.29%, while Insmed Incorporated (INSM) has a volatility of 30.56%. This indicates that EICOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EICOXINSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

30.56%

-23.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

43.84%

-29.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

58.25%

-42.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

72.66%

-58.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.61%

78.47%

-64.86%

Dividends

EICOX vs. INSM - Dividend Comparison

EICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while INSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EICOX
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund
2.89%3.68%2.02%1.95%5.72%2.71%0.10%2.00%2.95%0.00%0.59%2.35%
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EICOX and INSM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSM has higher volatility (30.56%) compared to EICOX (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICOX dropped -38.75% vs INSM's -98.65%.

EICOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EICOX and INSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer