PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EICIX vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EICIX vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EIC Value Fund (EICIX) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICIX achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 23.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EICIX having a 11.48% annualized return and FDT not far behind at 11.17%.


EICIX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.47%
YTD
5.81%
6M
4.81%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.48%

FDT

1D
0.21%
1M
0.87%
YTD
23.23%
6M
24.33%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EICIX vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EICIX
EIC Value Fund
5.81%16.01%11.55%12.91%0.90%30.08%4.27%22.64%-7.80%14.42%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
23.23%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EICIX and FDT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2011

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between EICIX and FDT has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EICIX vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EICIX
EICIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EICIX vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EIC Value Fund (EICIX) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EICIXFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.46

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.70

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

14.01

-10.21

EICIX vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICIX and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EICIX vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICIX drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICIX and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EICIXFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-46.10%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-13.41%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.10%

-14.29%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.36%

-32.80%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.26%

-46.10%

+11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-3.37%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-10.76%

+7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.54%

-0.15%

Volatility

EICIX vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EIC Value Fund (EICIX) is 2.99%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that EICIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EICIXFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

8.93%

-5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

17.27%

-9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

19.59%

-8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

18.46%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

18.62%

-2.35%

EICIX vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EICIX vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

EICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than FDT's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EICIX
EIC Value Fund
8.46%8.95%9.47%4.09%6.07%11.14%6.05%7.71%10.82%8.51%2.03%3.42%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.89%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EICIX and FDT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to EICIX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICIX dropped -34.26% vs FDT's -46.10%.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EICIX and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer