EICAX vs. VTMFX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EICAX (Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both mutual funds - EICAX is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while VTMFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Composite benchmark: Russell 1000 Index and Bloomberg 1-15 Year Municipal Bond Index. EICAX is actively managed, while VTMFX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EICAX returned 2.39%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for VTMFX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EICAX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.

Performance

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I (EICAX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICAX achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than VTMFX's 4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EICAX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 2.39%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.63% annualized return.

EICAX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 7.70%
• 3Y*: 4.36%
• 5Y*: 1.60%
• 10Y*: 2.39%

VTMFX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 4.50%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 11.82%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 8.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EICAX Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I	2.07%	4.17%	3.65%	5.65%	-7.43%	0.67%	5.58%	8.99%	1.31%	4.84%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	4.50%	11.28%	12.17%	15.55%	-12.69%	13.10%	13.31%	18.01%	-1.40%	12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EICAX and VTMFX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.06

Over the past year, EICAX and VTMFX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EICAX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EICAX

EICAX Risk / Return Rank: 75
EICAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EICAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EICAX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EICAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EICAX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

VTMFX

VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 64
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I (EICAX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EICAX	VTMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.20	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.10	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.42	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.65	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.99	12.34	-3.34

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICAX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICAX drawdown since its inception was -12.30%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICAX and VTMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EICAX	VTMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.30%	-28.49%	+16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-5.38%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.70%	-10.61%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.30%	-17.40%	+5.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.30%	-21.87%	+9.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-1.45%	+1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-3.54%	+1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.15%	-0.29%

Volatility

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I (EICAX) is 0.86%, while Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that EICAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EICAX	VTMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	2.56%	-1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.38%	5.22%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13%	6.49%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.96%	8.57%	-4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.67%	9.14%	-5.47%

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

EICAX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

EICAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than VTMFX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EICAX Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I	3.75%	4.61%	4.17%	2.57%	2.34%	1.76%	2.27%	3.62%	2.85%	2.76%	3.00%	3.77%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	2.14%	2.14%	2.08%	1.94%	1.85%	1.38%	1.72%	2.05%	2.22%	2.00%	2.13%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EICAX and VTMFX in my portfolio?

EICAX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EICAX or VTMFX?

VTMFX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to EICAX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICAX dropped -12.30% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EICAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.