EHY vs. UGA

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. EHY is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.

Performance

EHY vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -36.53% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 72.77% return.

EHY

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 12.11%
• 6M: -17.76%
• YTD: -36.53%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

UGA

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 54.03%
• YTD: 72.77%
• 1Y: 71.49%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 24.07%
• 10Y*: 16.28%
• ALL TIME*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	$63.17K	$39.74K	$73.16K
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	$8.67M	$6.11M	$4.99M

EHY vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-36.53%	-25.56%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	72.77%	-3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EHY and UGA is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

EHY vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EHY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 72
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EHY vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EHY	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.75	—

Drawdowns

EHY vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHY	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.70%	-86.59%	+24.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.32%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.84%	-14.67%	-38.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.86%	-36.52%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHY	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	32.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.54%	36.60%	+22.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.54%	34.71%	+24.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.54%	37.31%	+22.23%

EHY vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHY vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.23%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	59.23%	8.87%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHY and UGA in my portfolio?

EHY and UGA have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EHY or UGA?

On fees, EHY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EHY or UGA?

EHY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EHY or UGA?

EHY has the higher dividend yield at 59.23%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between EHY and UGA?

EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 1.02% for UGA.