EHY vs. UGA
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. EHY is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
EHY vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -47.40% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 59.54% return.
EHY
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- -27.85%
- YTD
- -47.40%
- 6M
- -46.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- 59.54%
- 6M
- 55.91%
- 1Y
- 62.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
EHY vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -47.40% | -25.56% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 59.54% | -3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and UGA is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UGA
EHY vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -86.59% | +25.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.92% | -20.32% | -40.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -36.69% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.51% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.88% | 34.84% | +26.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 34.47% | +26.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 37.22% | +23.66% |
EHY vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EHY and UGA have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
EHY vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.77%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 56.77% | 8.87% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and UGA have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EHY and UGA have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 56.77%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Concierge Technologies.
Find the right allocation for EHY and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer