EHY vs. SILJ
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. EHY is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
EHY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -37.68% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's -9.29% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- -42.96%
- YTD
- -37.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -13.78%
- 6M
- -22.24%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- 65.73%
- 3Y*
- 38.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
EHY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -37.68% | -25.56% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -9.29% | 13.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and SILJ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SILJ
EHY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -79.04% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.70% | -37.72% | -15.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -41.36% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.19% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.61% | 57.69% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.61% | 45.06% | +15.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.61% | 46.38% | +14.23% |
EHY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.54%, more than SILJ's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 53.54% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.21% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and SILJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 53.54%, compared with 2.21% for SILJ.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SILJ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.69% for SILJ.
Find the right allocation for EHY and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer