EHY vs. SILJ
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. EHY is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
EHY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -36.53% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 0.29% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 12.11%
- 6M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- -36.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- 6.28%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- 6M
- -17.09%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 81.93%
- 3Y*
- 46.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $63.17K | $39.74K | $73.16K | |
| $94.15M | $84.62M | $122.89M |
EHY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -36.53% | -25.56% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 0.29% | 13.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and SILJ is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SILJ
EHY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -79.04% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.84% | -31.14% | -21.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -41.35% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.44% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.54% | 58.89% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 45.28% | +14.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 46.42% | +13.12% |
EHY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.23%, more than SILJ's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 59.23% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.00% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and SILJ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 59.23%, compared with 2.00% for SILJ.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SILJ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.69% for SILJ.
Find the right allocation for EHY and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer