EHY vs. QDVO
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.
Performance
EHY vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -36.53% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 9.69% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 12.11%
- 6M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- -36.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QDVO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $63.17K | $39.74K | $73.16K | |
| $7.44M | $7.21M | $8.63M |
EHY vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -36.53% | -25.56% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 9.69% | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and QDVO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDVO
EHY vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and QDVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -17.75% | -43.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.84% | -1.04% | -51.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -2.46% | -35.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.54% | 13.32% | +46.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 17.44% | +42.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 17.44% | +42.10% |
EHY vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.23%, more than QDVO's 10.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 59.23% | 8.87% | 0.00% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 10.63% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and QDVO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 59.23%, compared with 10.63% for QDVO.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QDVO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.56% for QDVO.
Find the right allocation for EHY and QDVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer