EHY vs. QDVO
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).
EHY and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EHY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Oct 8, 2025. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.
Performance
EHY vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EHY vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -25.41% | -25.71% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | -4.93% | 1.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -25.41% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's -4.93% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- -25.41%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -2.40%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EHY vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
QDVO
EHY vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHY | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.14 | 0.92 | -2.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and QDVO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EHY vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.33%, more than QDVO's 11.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 28.33% | 8.87% | 0.00% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 11.17% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
EHY vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and QDVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.48% | -17.75% | -33.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.58% | -6.70% | -37.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.01% | -2.51% | -27.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.09% | 18.61% | +44.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.09% | 18.01% | +45.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.09% | 18.01% | +45.08% |