EHY vs. ILS

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

EHY vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -37.68% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 3.05% return.

EHY

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: -42.96%
• YTD: -37.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: 3.08%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHY vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-37.68%	-25.56%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	3.05%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EHY and ILS is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

EHY vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 97
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHY vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EHY	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.27	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.73	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	14.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	53.21	—

Drawdowns

EHY vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHY	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.70%	-2.46%	-59.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.70%	0.00%	-53.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.61%	-0.52%	-36.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHY	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.61%	2.49%	+58.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.61%	3.71%	+56.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.61%	3.71%	+56.90%

EHY vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHY vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.54%, more than ILS's 8.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	53.54%	8.87%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.17%	6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHY and ILS in my portfolio?

EHY and ILS have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EHY or ILS?

On fees, EHY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EHY or ILS?

EHY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EHY or ILS?

EHY has the higher dividend yield at 53.54%, compared with 8.17% for ILS.

What is the main difference between EHY and ILS?

EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 1.58% for ILS.