EHSTX vs. EIHMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX).
EHSTX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 23, 1931. EIHMX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 3, 1993.
Performance
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 0.60% | 12.11% | 11.25% | 7.93% | -2.80% | 24.25% | 2.29% | 30.84% | -6.96% | 14.79% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | -0.23% | 3.93% | 2.56% | 7.23% | -9.70% | 1.73% | 6.06% | 8.74% | 2.04% | 4.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHSTX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than EIHMX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has outperformed EIHMX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while EIHMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.
EHSTX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
EIHMX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EIHMX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EHSTX vs. EIHMX — Risk / Return Rank
EHSTX
EIHMX
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHSTX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.71 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.91 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 2.59 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHSTX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.71 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.22 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.72 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between EHSTX and EIHMX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Dividend Comparison
EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than EIHMX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 6.05% | 6.12% | 4.03% | 2.93% | 4.25% | 7.32% | 1.94% | 2.76% | 10.94% | 5.88% | 1.33% | 11.02% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | 4.02% | 4.99% | 4.38% | 3.21% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 2.90% | 3.88% | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.10% | 4.12% |
Drawdowns
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than EIHMX's maximum drawdown of -39.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and EIHMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHSTX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -39.87% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -5.46% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -15.32% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -15.32% | -23.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -2.49% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -3.52% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 1.91% | +0.95% |
Volatility
EHSTX vs. EIHMX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) at 1.28%. This indicates that EHSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EHSTX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 1.28% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 1.98% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 5.72% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 4.64% | +10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 4.40% | +12.87% |