PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHSTX vs. EARRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHSTX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has outperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.66% annualized return.


EHSTX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.67%
YTD
12.35%
6M
13.87%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
10.94%

EARRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
3.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
12.35%12.11%11.25%7.93%-2.80%24.25%2.29%30.84%-6.96%14.79%
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
1.58%5.46%5.39%5.95%-3.22%7.50%5.05%5.29%-0.49%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EHSTX and EARRX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHSTX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHSTX
EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EARRX
EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EHSTXEARRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.57

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

4.84

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

18.23

-6.75

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHSTX and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EHSTXEARRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.55

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.31

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.35

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.07

-0.55

Drawdowns

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and EARRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHSTXEARRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.47%

-10.27%

-43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-0.79%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.44%

-1.18%

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.44%

-6.39%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-10.27%

-29.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.10%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-1.08%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

0.21%

+1.83%

Volatility

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.49%. This indicates that EHSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHSTXEARRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

0.49%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

1.13%

+7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

1.50%

+9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

2.77%

+11.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

2.71%

+14.57%

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

EHSTX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than EARRX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
3.82%4.36%3.83%4.24%4.82%3.32%2.02%2.46%2.67%1.90%2.00%1.73%
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
5.41%6.12%4.03%2.93%4.25%7.32%1.94%2.76%10.94%5.88%1.33%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHSTX and EARRX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHSTX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to EARRX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHSTX dropped -53.47% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHSTX and EARRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer