EHLS vs. SENT
EHLS (Even Herd Long Short ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. EHLS is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past year, EHLS returned 23.69% vs 0.00% for SENT. EHLS charges 1.58%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.
Performance
EHLS vs. SENT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EHLS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SENT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
EHLS vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 15.59% | 6.67% | 11.57% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EHLS vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EHLS
SENT
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
EHLS
SENT
Industrials
EHLS
SENT
Energy
EHLS
SENT
Technology
EHLS
SENT
Healthcare
EHLS
SENT
Basic Materials
EHLS
SENT
Utilities
EHLS
SENT
-
Real Estate
EHLS
SENT
-
Communication Services
EHLS
SENT
Consumer Cyclical
EHLS
SENT
Consumer Defensive
EHLS
SENT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHLS vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank
EHLS
SENT
EHLS vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHLS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHLS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -0.25 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
EHLS vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and SENT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHLS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -30.34% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | 0.00% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -27.23% | +25.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -20.90% | +16.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 0.00% | +3.08% |
Volatility
EHLS vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison
Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that EHLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHLS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 0.00% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 0.00% | +14.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 0.00% | +18.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 12.66% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 13.32% | +6.44% |
EHLS vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHLS vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison
Neither EHLS nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHLS has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHLS dropped -18.96% vs SENT's -30.34%.
On 1-year performance, EHLS leads with 23.69% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EHLS has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.
EHLS and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: N/A and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 1.01% for SENT.
Find the right allocation for EHLS and SENT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer