PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHLS vs. SENT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHLS vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EHLS

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.51%
YTD
15.59%
6M
16.66%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SENT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
-4.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHLS vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
15.59%6.67%11.57%
SENT
AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

EHLS vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EHLS
SENT

Financial Services

15.6%
6.1%

Industrials

13.5%
14.6%

Energy

13.4%
10.3%

Technology

12.4%
26.2%

Healthcare

9.6%
24.8%

Basic Materials

8.3%
3.0%

Utilities

7.9%

-

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Communication Services

5.0%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.1%

Financial Services

EHLS
15.6%
SENT
6.1%

Industrials

EHLS
13.5%
SENT
14.6%

Energy

EHLS
13.4%
SENT
10.3%

Technology

EHLS
12.4%
SENT
26.2%

Healthcare

EHLS
9.6%
SENT
24.8%

Basic Materials

EHLS
8.3%
SENT
3.0%

Utilities

EHLS
7.9%
SENT

-

Real Estate

EHLS
5.7%
SENT

-

Communication Services

EHLS
5.0%
SENT
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EHLS
4.5%
SENT
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

EHLS
4.3%
SENT
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHLS vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHLS
EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SENT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHLS vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EHLSSENTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.72

EHLS vs. SENT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EHLSSENTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

-0.25

+1.06

Drawdowns

EHLS vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and SENT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHLSSENTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-30.34%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

0.00%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-27.23%

+25.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-20.90%

+16.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

0.00%

+3.08%

Volatility

EHLS vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that EHLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHLSSENTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

0.00%

+5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

0.00%

+14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

0.00%

+18.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

12.66%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

13.32%

+6.44%

EHLS vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EHLS vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

Neither EHLS nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
0.00%0.00%1.03%
SENT
AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHLS has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHLS dropped -18.96% vs SENT's -30.34%.

On 1-year performance, EHLS leads with 23.69% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EHLS has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

EHLS and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: N/A and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 1.01% for SENT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHLS and SENT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer