EHLS vs. ATTR
EHLS (Even Herd Long Short ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EHLS charges 1.58%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
EHLS vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHLS achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than ATTR's 4.25% return.
EHLS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EHLS vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 15.59% | -1.36% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHLS and ATTR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHLS vs. ATTR — Risk / Return Rank
EHLS
ATTR
EHLS vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 2.81 | -2.01 |
Drawdowns
EHLS vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -1.76% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -0.19% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -0.18% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility
EHLS vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 2.97% | +15.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 2.97% | +16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 2.97% | +16.79% |
EHLS vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHLS vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither EHLS nor ATTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHLS and ATTR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.
EHLS and ATTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: N/A and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for EHLS and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer