PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

EHE.TO (CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF) and CGAA.TO (CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - EHE.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Europe CAD-Hedged Equity Index, while CGAA.TO is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by CI. EHE.TO is passively managed, while CGAA.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EHE.TO returned 9.43%/yr vs 5.75%/yr for CGAA.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHE.TO achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than CGAA.TO's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EHE.TO has outperformed CGAA.TO with an annualized return of 9.43%, while CGAA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.75% annualized return.

EHE.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.71%
6M
3.00%
YTD
7.01%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
9.43%

CGAA.TO

1D
-1.25%
1M
-1.46%
6M
-0.17%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF		7.01%22.91%4.19%22.26%-10.45%23.79%-5.96%24.49%-10.68%15.40%
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool		2.05%10.61%16.99%9.22%-11.13%15.14%11.57%15.08%-17.29%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EHE.TO and CGAA.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.29

The correlation between EHE.TO and CGAA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (10 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF

CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool

Often compared with EHE.TO:
EHE.TO vs. CGRA.TOEHE.TO vs. FIG.TOEHE.TO vs. VXM-B.TOEHE.TO vs. SOLX.TOEHE.TO vs. XEH.TOEHE.TO vs. ZEQ.TOEHE.TO vs. CBCX.TO
Often compared with CGAA.TO:
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TOCGAA.TO vs. CBCX.TOCGAA.TO vs. CGXF.TOCGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TOCGAA.TO vs. HCON.TOCGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TOCGAA.TO vs. CEQT.TO

Return for Risk

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EHE.TO
EHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
CGAA.TO
CGAA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CGAA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EHE.TOCGAA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.05
0.99

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.59
1.52

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.39

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

4.87

+0.53

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the CGAA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHE.TO and CGAA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum CGAA.TO drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHE.TO and CGAA.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EHE.TOCGAA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-41.34%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-7.59%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-11.64%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-17.23%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.20%

-23.56%

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-2.81%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-7.45%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.16%

+0.98%

Volatility

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) at 2.73%. This indicates that EHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGAA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EHE.TOCGAA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.73%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

8.45%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

10.61%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

11.64%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

12.21%

+5.21%

Dividends

EHE.TO vs. CGAA.TO - Dividend Comparison

EHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than CGAA.TO's 1.75% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool		1.75%1.57%2.00%2.19%2.21%0.91%1.14%2.66%3.74%3.36%3.12%3.20%
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF		2.17%2.16%4.38%3.30%2.19%1.90%2.55%2.02%2.08%1.37%0.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EHE.TO and CGAA.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHE.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while CGAA.TO is Global Allocation.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHE.TO and CGAA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer