CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO
CGAA.TO (CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool) and CGRA.TO (CI Global Real Asset Private Pool) are both Global Allocation funds from CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGAA.TO returned 7.25%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for CGRA.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGAA.TO achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than CGRA.TO's 15.15% return.
CGAA.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
CGRA.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAA.TO CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool | 3.81% | 10.61% | 16.99% | 9.22% | -11.13% | 15.14% | 15.20% |
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 15.15% | 7.16% | 10.58% | 6.33% | -9.03% | 20.00% | 6.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGAA.TO and CGRA.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGAA.TO
CGRA.TO
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) and CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGAA.TO | CGRA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.70 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.68 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 9.91 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGAA.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than CGRA.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAA.TO and CGRA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGAA.TO | CGRA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -16.03% | -25.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -6.43% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.64% | -7.89% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.23% | -16.03% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | 0.00% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -3.83% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.73% | +0.41% |
Volatility
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) at 2.67%. This indicates that CGAA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGRA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGAA.TO | CGRA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 2.67% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 7.14% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 8.43% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 12.12% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 11.68% | +0.57% |
Dividends
CGAA.TO vs. CGRA.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGAA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than CGRA.TO's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAA.TO CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool | 1.72% | 1.57% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 2.21% | 0.91% | 1.14% | 2.66% | 3.74% | 3.36% | 3.12% | 3.20% |
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 3.56% | 4.02% | 4.14% | 4.39% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGAA.TO and CGRA.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CGAA.TO and CGRA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer