CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO
CGAA.TO (CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool) and ZWQT.TO (BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGAA.TO returned 12.34%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for ZWQT.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGAA.TO achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than ZWQT.TO's 15.05% return.
CGAA.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
ZWQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAA.TO CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool | 3.81% | 10.61% | 16.99% | 6.12% |
ZWQT.TO BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF | 15.05% | 14.08% | 17.82% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGAA.TO and ZWQT.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGAA.TO
ZWQT.TO
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) and BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGAA.TO | ZWQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.59 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 5.40 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 22.17 | -16.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGAA.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than ZWQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAA.TO and ZWQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGAA.TO | ZWQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -14.93% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -5.47% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.64% | -14.93% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.45% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -1.47% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.33% | +0.81% |
Volatility
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) is 3.43%, while BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that CGAA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGAA.TO | ZWQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 3.67% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 7.66% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 9.70% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 11.02% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 11.02% | +1.23% |
Dividends
CGAA.TO vs. ZWQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGAA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than ZWQT.TO's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAA.TO CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool | 1.72% | 1.57% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 2.21% | 0.91% | 1.14% | 2.66% | 3.74% | 3.36% | 3.12% | 3.20% |
ZWQT.TO BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF | 4.94% | 5.54% | 5.96% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGAA.TO and ZWQT.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and BMO.
Find the right allocation for CGAA.TO and ZWQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer