CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO
CGAA.TO (CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool) and CMNY.TO (CI Money Market ETF CAD Series) are both exchange-traded funds - CGAA.TO is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by CI, while CMNY.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGAA.TO returned 12.82% vs 2.44% for CMNY.TO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGAA.TO achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly higher than CMNY.TO's 1.17% return.
CGAA.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
CMNY.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAA.TO CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool | 3.81% | 10.61% | 16.99% | 3.86% |
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series | 1.17% | 2.83% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGAA.TO and CMNY.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGAA.TO
CMNY.TO
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) and CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGAA.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 3.60 | -2.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 49.15 | -47.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 197.17 | -191.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGAA.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than CMNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAA.TO and CMNY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGAA.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -0.83% | -40.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -0.05% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | 0.00% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -0.05% | -7.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.01% | +2.13% |
Volatility
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool (CGAA.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that CGAA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGAA.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 0.08% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 0.22% | +8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 0.34% | +10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 1.01% | +10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 1.01% | +11.24% |
Dividends
CGAA.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGAA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than CMNY.TO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAA.TO CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool | 1.72% | 1.57% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 2.21% | 0.91% | 1.14% | 2.66% | 3.74% | 3.36% | 3.12% | 3.20% |
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series | 2.49% | 2.89% | 4.64% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGAA.TO and CMNY.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGAA.TO is categorized as Global Allocation, while CMNY.TO is Money Market.
Find the right allocation for CGAA.TO and CMNY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer