PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGUS vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGUS vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGUS achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.


EGUS

1D
-2.34%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
7.09%
6M
5.77%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.08%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGUS vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EGUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
7.09%19.02%32.85%27.00%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EGUS and AGG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.16

The correlation between EGUS and AGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGUS vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGUS
EGUS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGUS vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGUSAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.57

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

4.54

+1.05

EGUS vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGUS and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGUS vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGUS drawdown since its inception was -24.87%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGUS and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGUSAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.87%

-18.43%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.66%

-2.76%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-6.11%

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-1.93%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-2.71%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

0.96%

+3.74%

Volatility

EGUS vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.10%. This indicates that EGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGUSAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

1.10%

+6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

2.83%

+11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

3.81%

+13.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

6.10%

+13.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

5.41%

+13.92%

EGUS vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EGUS vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

EGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
EGUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
0.21%0.22%0.25%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGUS and AGG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EGUS has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to AGG (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGUS dropped -24.87% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 3-year performance, EGUS leads with 24.15% vs 3.96% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EGUS has performed better with a 24.15% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EGUS.

AGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.21% for EGUS.

EGUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AGG is Total Bond Market. EGUS tracks MSCI USA Growth Extended ESG Focus Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EGUS and 0.03% for AGG.

EGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGUS and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer