PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EGPT vs. EMIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EGPT vs. EMIF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

EGPT (VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF) and EMIF (iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGPT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MVIS Egypt Index, while EMIF is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EGPT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMIF.

Performance

EGPT vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

EGPT

1D
—
1M
—
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

EMIF

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.38%
6M
-7.11%
YTD
0.44%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
1.66%
ALL TIME*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EMIF

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
$49.09K$40.45K$71.84K

EGPT vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EGPT
VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF		0.00%0.00%-11.22%27.27%-24.66%11.31%-11.53%6.80%-13.88%24.83%
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF		0.44%33.90%1.21%5.67%-12.59%3.76%-19.98%16.36%-13.70%20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EGPT and EMIF is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2010

0.24

The correlation between EGPT and EMIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EGPT vs. EMIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EGPT
EMIF

Real Estate

30.5%

-

Basic Materials

23.4%

-

Financial Services

10.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.0%

-

Technology

8.0%

-

Industrials

6.9%
44.6%

Communication Services

4.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%

-

Healthcare

2.0%

-

Energy

1.1%
18.3%

Utilities

-

37.1%

Real Estate

EGPT
30.5%
EMIF

-

Basic Materials

EGPT
23.4%
EMIF

-

Financial Services

EGPT
10.5%
EMIF

-

Consumer Defensive

EGPT
10.0%
EMIF

-

Technology

EGPT
8.0%
EMIF

-

Industrials

EGPT
6.9%
EMIF
44.6%

Communication Services

EGPT
4.2%
EMIF

-

Consumer Cyclical

EGPT
3.5%
EMIF

-

Healthcare

EGPT
2.0%
EMIF

-

Energy

EGPT
1.1%
EMIF
18.3%

Utilities

EGPT

-

EMIF
37.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with EGPT:
EGPT vs. EISEGPT vs. VOOEGPT vs. EFAEGPT vs. SPYEGPT vs. TUREGPT vs. SMINEGPT vs. NVDA
Often compared with EMIF:
EMIF vs. SPYEMIF vs. IVVEMIF vs. IYKEMIF vs. BNEMIF vs. VDCEMIF vs. JXIEMIF vs. PAVE

Return for Risk

EGPT vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EGPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMIF
EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EGPT vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EGPTEMIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

0.97

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.45

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.18

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

1.00

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

2.23

—

EGPT vs. EMIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGPT vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EGPTEMIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

—

-48.02%

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-15.71%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.70%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-23.29%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-48.02%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

—

-13.57%

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

—

-15.89%

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

7.00%

—

Volatility

EGPT vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EGPTEMIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.41%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

13.24%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

16.21%

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

—

19.67%

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

—

20.54%

—

EGPT vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGPT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGPT vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison

EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EGPT
VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF		0.00%0.00%0.15%6.02%1.32%2.45%2.50%2.09%1.72%0.77%1.60%1.59%
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF		4.21%4.96%4.12%2.64%3.08%3.94%2.54%2.07%2.64%2.58%3.16%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

EGPT and EMIF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.

EMIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.

EGPT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EMIF is Infrastructure Equities. EGPT tracks MVIS Egypt Index, while EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EGPT and 0.75% for EMIF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGPT and EMIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer