EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L
EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGLN.L returned 19.69%/yr vs 22.43%/yr for ISLN.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGLN.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISLN.L.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EGLN.L is traded in EUR, while ISLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than ISLN.L's 4.04% return.
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 110.19%
- 3Y*
- 42.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.83% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | 13.68% | 20.62% | 3.36% | -1.73% |
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 4.04% | 118.21% | 29.12% | -3.74% | 9.80% | -6.33% | 33.83% | 18.98% | -4.48% | -9.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and ISLN.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2016 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EGLN.L and ISLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
EGLN.L
ISLN.L
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGLN.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.84 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 6.19 | -1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGLN.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.97 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.66 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.17 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum ISLN.L drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and ISLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGLN.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -68.25% | +49.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -38.56% | +21.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | -38.56% | +21.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.70% | -38.56% | +21.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.21% | -33.41% | +18.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -43.05% | +36.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 17.73% | -11.16% |
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) is 5.42%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 17.10%. This indicates that EGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGLN.L | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 17.10% | -11.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.15% | 52.98% | -32.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.14% | 55.71% | -32.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 34.21% | -18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 29.82% | -15.44% |
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGLN.L nor ISLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EGLN.L and ISLN.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.
EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while ISLN.L is Silver. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.20% for ISLN.L.
Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and ISLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer