EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE
EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EGLN.L returned 22.86% vs 16.90% for ASWC.DE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGLN.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ASWC.DE.
Performance
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGLN.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than ASWC.DE's 13.04% return.
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 16.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.76% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 5.61% |
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.04% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGLN.L and ASWC.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EGLN.L
ASWC.DE
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGLN.L | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.36 | 3.10 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, which is greater than ASWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGLN.L and ASWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGLN.L | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.44% | -12.58% | -34.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.94% | -12.58% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.73% | -2.83% | -16.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -2.47% | -20.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.17% | 5.51% | +1.66% |
Volatility
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) at 5.89%. This indicates that EGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGLN.L | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 5.89% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 15.89% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 20.35% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 19.11% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 19.11% | -3.11% |
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGLN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASWC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGLN.L vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGLN.L nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EGLN.L and ASWC.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
EGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while ASWC.DE is Aerospace & Defense. EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EGLN.L and 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for EGLN.L and ASWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer