EGGS vs. MAGY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 7.11% vs 1.42% for MAGY. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGY.

Performance

EGGS vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -6.83% return.

EGGS

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: -7.60%
• 6M: 8.61%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.62%

MAGY

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: -7.69%
• YTD: -6.83%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	$346.93K	$392.42K	$515.09K
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	$1.76M	$2.00M	$2.81M

EGGS vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	5.83%	26.79%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-6.83%	26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and MAGY is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.51

The correlation between EGGS and MAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EGGS vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EGGS

EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 14
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 14

MAGY

MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 10
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EGGS vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGGS	MAGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	-0.05	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	0.04	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.01	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	-0.06	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	-0.16	+0.61

EGGS vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the MAGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and MAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and MAGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGS	MAGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.23%	-14.29%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.23%	-14.29%	-9.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.16%	-8.86%	-7.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.12%	-3.41%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.07%	5.53%	+3.54%

Volatility

EGGS vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) at 6.83%. This indicates that EGGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGS	MAGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.49%	6.83%	+9.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.07%	14.10%	+12.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.46%	16.87%	+13.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.34%	16.18%	+12.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.34%	16.18%	+12.16%

EGGS vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGS vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.32%, less than MAGY's 39.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	19.32%	14.52%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	38.99%	23.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGS and MAGY in my portfolio?

EGGS and MAGY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGGS or MAGY?

EGGS has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to MAGY (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -24.23% vs MAGY's -14.29%.

Which ETF is better, EGGS or MAGY?

On 1-year performance, EGGS leads with 7.11% vs 1.42% for MAGY. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGS or MAGY?

Over the 1-year period, EGGS has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGS or MAGY?

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGS or MAGY?

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 38.99%, compared with 19.32% for EGGS.

What is the main difference between EGGS and MAGY?

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.99% for MAGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.