EGGS vs. COSW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COSW.

Performance

EGGS vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 22.55% return, which is significantly higher than COSW's 11.78% return.

EGGS

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 8.34%
• YTD: 22.55%
• 6M: 20.00%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COSW

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -8.28%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	22.55%	-8.10%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	11.78%	-10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and COSW is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

EGGS vs. COSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS

EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 32
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

COSW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGGS	COSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	—	—

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and COSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGS	COSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-16.24%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.91%	-14.89%	+11.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-4.94%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EGGS	COSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.05%	25.46%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.20%	25.46%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.20%	25.46%	-0.26%

EGGS vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGS vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.81%, less than COSW's 19.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	19.61%	4.96%
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	14.81%	14.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGS and COSW in my portfolio?

EGGS and COSW have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EGGS or COSW?

On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGS or COSW?

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGS or COSW?

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 19.61%, compared with 14.81% for EGGS.

What is the main difference between EGGS and COSW?

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.99% for COSW.