HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) and Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO).
Performance
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPS-A.TO Hammond Power Solutions Inc | 12.97% | 25.75% | 58.01% | 310.59% | 71.98% | 46.22% | 16.10% | 39.86% | -35.72% | 56.06% |
POW.TO Power Corporation of Canada | -5.53% | 69.74% | 25.05% | 26.19% | -19.21% | 49.93% | -4.77% | 44.07% | -20.08% | 12.80% |
Fundamentals
HPS-A.TO:
CA$2.14B
POW.TO:
CA$44.18B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$6.06
POW.TO:
CA$4.79
HPS-A.TO:
29.68
POW.TO:
14.26
HPS-A.TO:
2.39
POW.TO:
1.39
HPS-A.TO:
6.08
POW.TO:
3.09
HPS-A.TO:
CA$898.26M
POW.TO:
CA$31.86B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$272.32M
POW.TO:
CA$11.64B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$122.66M
POW.TO:
CA$6.56B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPS-A.TO achieves a 12.97% return, which is significantly higher than POW.TO's -5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, HPS-A.TO has outperformed POW.TO with an annualized return of 43.40%, while POW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.73% annualized return.
HPS-A.TO
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 43.43%
- 1Y
- 128.05%
- 3Y*
- 69.30%
- 5Y*
- 79.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.40%
POW.TO
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- -5.53%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- 37.32%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 21.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HPS-A.TO
POW.TO
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) and Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPS-A.TO | POW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 1.99 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.50 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.77 | +2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 8.20 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPS-A.TO | POW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.99 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.65 | 1.31 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.64 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between HPS-A.TO and POW.TO is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Dividend Comparison
HPS-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than POW.TO's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPS-A.TO Hammond Power Solutions Inc | 0.61% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.67% | 1.91% | 2.84% | 4.01% | 3.65% | 4.21% | 2.62% | 3.96% | 3.77% |
POW.TO Power Corporation of Canada | 3.67% | 3.36% | 5.02% | 5.54% | 6.22% | 4.40% | 7.51% | 4.77% | 6.13% | 4.36% | 4.38% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPS-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.00%, which is greater than POW.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPS-A.TO and POW.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPS-A.TO | POW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.00% | -62.40% | -17.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.14% | -14.33% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | -26.09% | -28.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -49.16% | -5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.08% | -6.94% | -9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -11.65% | -19.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 4.83% | +8.47% |
Volatility
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 20.55% compared to Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) at 7.62%. This indicates that HPS-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HPS-A.TO | POW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.55% | 7.62% | +12.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.31% | 13.97% | +32.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.66% | 18.89% | +41.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.06% | 16.71% | +32.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 23.11% | +19.36% |
Financials
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hammond Power Solutions Inc and Power Corporation of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HPS-A.TO vs. POW.TO - Profitability Comparison
HPS-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 74.31M and revenue of 254.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.
POW.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported a gross profit of 5.17B and revenue of 13.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
HPS-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 21.96M and revenue of 254.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
POW.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 13.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
HPS-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported a net income of 15.20M and revenue of 254.09M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
POW.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported a net income of 716.00M and revenue of 13.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.