HPS-A.TO vs. FTS
Compare and contrast key facts about Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) and Fortis Inc (FTS).
Performance
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPS-A.TO Hammond Power Solutions Inc | 10.13% | 25.75% | 58.01% | 310.59% | 71.98% | 46.22% | 16.10% | 39.86% | -35.72% | 56.06% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 9.77% | 23.67% | 14.90% | 5.01% | -7.54% | 21.62% | 0.19% | 22.66% | 2.12% | 16.53% |
Different Trading Currencies
HPS-A.TO is traded in CAD, while FTS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
HPS-A.TO:
CA$2.09B
FTS:
$33.97B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$6.06
FTS:
$3.12
HPS-A.TO:
28.93
FTS:
17.90
HPS-A.TO:
0.47
FTS:
2.61
HPS-A.TO:
2.33
FTS:
2.65
HPS-A.TO:
5.93
FTS:
1.53
HPS-A.TO:
CA$898.26M
FTS:
$11.34B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$272.32M
FTS:
$6.40B
HPS-A.TO:
CA$122.66M
FTS:
$5.35B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HPS-A.TO having a 10.13% return and FTS slightly lower at 9.77%. Over the past 10 years, HPS-A.TO has outperformed FTS with an annualized return of 43.04%, while FTS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.
HPS-A.TO
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 42.48%
- 1Y
- 132.25%
- 3Y*
- 67.87%
- 5Y*
- 78.89%
- 10Y*
- 43.04%
FTS
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
HPS-A.TO
FTS
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPS-A.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.67 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 2.39 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 3.84 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 8.00 | +1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPS-A.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.67 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.63 | 0.82 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 0.65 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.68 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between HPS-A.TO and FTS is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
HPS-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FTS's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPS-A.TO Hammond Power Solutions Inc | 0.63% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.67% | 1.91% | 2.84% | 4.01% | 3.65% | 4.21% | 2.62% | 3.96% | 3.77% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.25% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPS-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.00%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPS-A.TO and FTS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPS-A.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.00% | -34.36% | -45.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.14% | -6.63% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | -29.96% | -24.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -34.36% | -19.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.18% | -4.73% | -13.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -6.90% | -24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.26% | 2.57% | +10.69% |
Volatility
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
Hammond Power Solutions Inc (HPS-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.23% compared to Fortis Inc (FTS) at 4.39%. This indicates that HPS-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HPS-A.TO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.23% | 4.39% | +16.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.26% | 9.55% | +36.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.80% | 13.65% | +47.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.07% | 14.39% | +34.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 16.96% | +25.51% |
Financials
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hammond Power Solutions Inc and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HPS-A.TO vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison
HPS-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 74.31M and revenue of 254.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 3.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.8%.
HPS-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 21.96M and revenue of 254.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 868.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
HPS-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Power Solutions Inc reported a net income of 15.20M and revenue of 254.09M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 444.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.