EFV vs. SPMO
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFV returned 10.55%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
EFV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.55%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.
EFV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
EFV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 10.56% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and SPMO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.53 |
The correlation between EFV and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EFV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
SPMO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFV
SPMO
Industrials
EFV
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
EFV
SPMO
Healthcare
EFV
SPMO
Energy
EFV
SPMO
Basic Materials
EFV
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
SPMO
Utilities
EFV
SPMO
Communication Services
EFV
SPMO
Technology
EFV
SPMO
Real Estate
EFV
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
SPMO
EFV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.44 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 13.01 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -30.95% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -12.70% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -20.13% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -22.74% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -30.95% | -12.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.68% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -4.60% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.35% | -0.39% |
Volatility
EFV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 4.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 10.29% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 16.73% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 19.48% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 19.65% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 20.48% | -2.63% |
EFV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.76% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 10.55% for EFV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer