PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.55%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.


EFV

1D
0.48%
1M
0.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
12.39%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
10.55%

SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
4.23%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
10.56%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and SPMO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.53

The correlation between EFV and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFV
SPMO

Financial Services

37.3%
5.7%

Industrials

9.6%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.0%

Healthcare

7.4%
6.2%

Energy

6.8%
3.1%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
1.3%

Utilities

5.7%
2.5%

Communication Services

4.4%
8.7%

Technology

3.2%
54.8%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.9%

Financial Services

EFV
37.3%
SPMO
5.7%

Industrials

EFV
9.6%
SPMO
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
9.5%
SPMO
4.0%

Healthcare

EFV
7.4%
SPMO
6.2%

Energy

EFV
6.8%
SPMO
3.1%

Basic Materials

EFV
6.5%
SPMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
6.0%
SPMO
1.3%

Utilities

EFV
5.7%
SPMO
2.5%

Communication Services

EFV
4.4%
SPMO
8.7%

Technology

EFV
3.2%
SPMO
54.8%

Real Estate

EFV
2.7%
SPMO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFVSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.44

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

13.01

-3.61

EFV vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-30.95%

-32.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-12.70%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-20.13%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-22.74%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-30.95%

-12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.68%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-4.60%

-10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.35%

-0.39%

Volatility

EFV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 4.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFVSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

10.29%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

16.73%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

19.48%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

19.65%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

20.48%

-2.63%

EFV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.76%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 10.55% for EFV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.

EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer