PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFV vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 14.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 9.75%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.


EFV

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.75%

IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.13%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and IDOG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.93

The correlation between EFV and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFV
IDOG

Financial Services

36.9%
11.0%

Industrials

10.2%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
9.4%

Basic Materials

7.5%
10.0%

Healthcare

7.2%
9.3%

Energy

7.0%
10.7%

Utilities

5.9%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
9.5%

Communication Services

4.4%
9.9%

Technology

4.3%
8.5%

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Financial Services

EFV
36.9%
IDOG
11.0%

Industrials

EFV
10.2%
IDOG
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
8.3%
IDOG
9.4%

Basic Materials

EFV
7.5%
IDOG
10.0%

Healthcare

EFV
7.2%
IDOG
9.3%

Energy

EFV
7.0%
IDOG
10.7%

Utilities

EFV
5.9%
IDOG
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
4.8%
IDOG
9.5%

Communication Services

EFV
4.4%
IDOG
9.9%

Technology

EFV
4.3%
IDOG
8.5%

Real Estate

EFV
2.5%
IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFVIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

5.51

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

19.31

-9.74

EFV vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFVIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.68

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.86

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.63

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.51

-0.25

Drawdowns

EFV vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-37.32%

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-6.47%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-13.92%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-25.31%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-37.32%

-5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-0.47%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-7.93%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.84%

+1.07%

Volatility

EFV vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.13%. This indicates that EFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFVIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.13%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

10.09%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

13.33%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

15.61%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.45%

+0.41%

EFV vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFV vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than IDOG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.81%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFV and IDOG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 10.99% vs 9.75% for EFV. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.42% for IDOG.

EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer