EFV vs. FID
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFV tracks the MSCI EAFE Value Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFV returned 12.07%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
EFV vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.
EFV
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
EFV vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 9.13% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -11.57% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and FID is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EFV and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFV vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
FID
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFV
FID
Industrials
EFV
FID
Consumer Defensive
EFV
FID
Basic Materials
EFV
FID
Healthcare
EFV
FID
Energy
EFV
FID
Utilities
EFV
FID
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
FID
Communication Services
EFV
FID
Technology
EFV
FID
Real Estate
EFV
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
FID
EFV vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.62 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 9.14 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.30 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.46 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.39 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
EFV vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -39.79% | -24.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -8.93% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -10.97% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -29.13% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -1.11% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -8.47% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.55% | +0.36% |
Volatility
EFV vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that EFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.00% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 8.12% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 10.16% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 17.04% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 18.96% | -1.10% |
EFV vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.81% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFV and FID have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, EFV leads with 12.07% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFV has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.81% for EFV.
EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer