EFV vs. DEHP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and DEHP (Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index, while DEHP is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional. EFV is passively managed, while DEHP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFV returned 22.47%/yr vs 25.54%/yr for DEHP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DEHP.

Performance

EFV vs. DEHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than DEHP's 35.45% return.

EFV

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 6M: 13.20%
• 1Y: 28.38%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: 12.21%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

DEHP

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 10.85%
• YTD: 35.45%
• 6M: 39.02%
• 1Y: 66.88%
• 3Y*: 25.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. DEHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	9.79%	42.22%	5.35%	18.85%	0.59%
DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF	35.45%	32.86%	4.47%	12.31%	-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and DEHP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022	0.70

The correlation between EFV and DEHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. DEHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFV	DEHP
Financial Services	36.9%	6.5%
Industrials	10.2%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	4.3%
Basic Materials	7.5%	7.7%
Healthcare	7.2%	2.5%
Energy	7.0%	5.0%
Utilities	5.9%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	9.0%
Communication Services	4.4%	11.4%
Technology	4.3%	41.3%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.4%

Return for Risk

EFV vs. DEHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV

EFV Risk / Return Rank: 58
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DEHP

DEHP Risk / Return Rank: 89
DEHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DEHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DEHP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DEHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DEHP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. DEHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFV	DEHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	3.21	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	4.11	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.57	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	5.11	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	20.55	-10.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFV vs. DEHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the DEHP Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and DEHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFV	DEHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	3.21	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.92	-0.65

Drawdowns

EFV vs. DEHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than DEHP's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and DEHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFV	DEHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.94%	-22.90%	-41.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.90%	-13.16%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.72%	-19.14%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-1.18%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.82%	-5.75%	-9.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.26%	-0.34%

Volatility

EFV vs. DEHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 4.44%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFV	DEHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	9.93%	-5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	18.56%	-6.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.18%	20.97%	-6.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	18.62%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	18.62%	-0.76%

EFV vs. DEHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DEHP's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFV vs. DEHP - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than DEHP's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF	1.32%	1.73%	2.44%	2.84%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF	3.79%	4.16%	4.66%	4.36%	4.17%	4.07%	2.42%	4.62%	4.56%	3.56%	3.28%	3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFV and DEHP in my portfolio?

EFV and DEHP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFV or DEHP?

DEHP has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to EFV (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs DEHP's -22.90%.

Which ETF is better, EFV or DEHP?

On 3-year performance, DEHP leads with 25.54% vs 22.47% for EFV. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFV or DEHP?

Over the 3-year period, DEHP has performed better with a 25.54% return vs 22.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFV or DEHP?

EFV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DEHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFV or DEHP?

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.32% for DEHP.

What is the main difference between EFV and DEHP?

EFV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DEHP is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.41% for DEHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.