PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEHP vs. EYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEHP vs. EYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEHP achieves a 35.45% return, which is significantly higher than EYLD's 23.85% return.


DEHP

1D
-1.18%
1M
10.85%
YTD
35.45%
6M
39.02%
1Y
66.88%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
10Y*

EYLD

1D
-1.52%
1M
6.52%
YTD
23.85%
6M
25.44%
1Y
45.30%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEHP vs. EYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DEHP
Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
35.45%32.86%4.47%12.31%-9.73%
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
23.85%29.39%4.72%18.77%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DEHP and EYLD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.78

The correlation between DEHP and EYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEHP vs. EYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEHP
EYLD

Technology

41.3%
18.7%

Communication Services

11.4%
2.7%

Industrials

11.4%
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
6.3%

Basic Materials

7.7%
1.5%

Financial Services

6.5%
20.9%

Energy

5.0%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.2%

Healthcare

2.5%
2.1%

Utilities

0.6%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.3%

Technology

DEHP
41.3%
EYLD
18.7%

Communication Services

DEHP
11.4%
EYLD
2.7%

Industrials

DEHP
11.4%
EYLD
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DEHP
9.0%
EYLD
6.3%

Basic Materials

DEHP
7.7%
EYLD
1.5%

Financial Services

DEHP
6.5%
EYLD
20.9%

Energy

DEHP
5.0%
EYLD
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

DEHP
4.3%
EYLD
3.2%

Healthcare

DEHP
2.5%
EYLD
2.1%

Utilities

DEHP
0.6%
EYLD
4.8%

Real Estate

DEHP
0.4%
EYLD
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEHP vs. EYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEHP
DEHP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DEHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DEHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EYLD
EYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEHP vs. EYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEHPEYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.21

2.55

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.11

3.34

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.46

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

4.33

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.55

16.12

+4.43

DEHP vs. EYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the EYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEHP and EYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEHPEYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

2.55

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.56

+0.37

Drawdowns

DEHP vs. EYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEHP drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum EYLD drawdown of -41.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEHP and EYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEHPEYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-41.82%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-10.52%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-20.89%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.52%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-10.29%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.82%

+0.44%

Volatility

DEHP vs. EYLD - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) at 7.68%. This indicates that DEHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEHPEYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.93%

7.68%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

14.94%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

17.83%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

18.28%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

21.68%

-3.06%

DEHP vs. EYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEHP has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than EYLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEHP vs. EYLD - Dividend Comparison

DEHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than EYLD's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEHP
Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
1.32%1.73%2.44%2.84%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
4.89%5.40%5.16%5.54%6.97%7.27%3.02%4.21%7.87%2.77%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEHP and EYLD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEHP has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to EYLD (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEHP dropped -22.90% vs EYLD's -41.82%.

On 3-year performance, DEHP leads with 25.54% vs 24.97% for EYLD. On fees, DEHP is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, EYLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DEHP has performed better with a 25.54% return vs 24.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEHP is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EYLD.

EYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.32% for DEHP.

DEHP is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while EYLD is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DEHP and 0.65% for EYLD.

DEHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEHP and EYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer